Metacognition: Knowing About Knowing

Metacognition: Knowing About Knowing eBook É
    download books from your favorite authors on Apple books personal self Without such processes, one would presumably respond to stimuli in an automatized and environmentally bound manner Metacognition: Knowing PDF \ that is, without the characteristic patterns of behavior and introspection that are manifested as plans, strategies, reflections, self control, self monitoring, and intelligence A Bradford Book."/>
  • Paperback
  • Metacognition: Knowing About Knowing
  • Janet Metcalfe
  • English
  • 15 November 2019
  • 0262631695

About the Author: Janet Metcalfe

Is a well known author, some of his books are a fascination for readers like in the Metacognition: Knowing About Knowing book, this is one of the most wanted Janet Metcalfe author readers around the world.


Metacognition: Knowing About Knowing☆ Metacognition: Knowing About Knowing PDF / Epub ✩ Author Janet Metcalfe – Johndore.co.uk Metacognition offers an up to date compendium of major scientific issues involved in metacognition The twelve original contributions provide a concise statement of theoretical and empirical research o Metacognition offers an up to date compendium of major scientific issues involved in metacognition The twelve original contributions provide a concise statement of theoretical and empirical research on self reflective processes or knowing about what we knowSelf reflective processes are often thought to be central to what we mean by consciousness and the personal self Without such processes, one would presumably respond to stimuli in an automatized and environmentally bound manner Metacognition: Knowing PDF \ that is, without the characteristic patterns of behavior and introspection that are manifested as plans, strategies, reflections, self control, self monitoring, and intelligence A Bradford Book.

You may also like...

10 thoughts on “Metacognition: Knowing About Knowing

  1. g says:

    A principios de los a os 2000 este libro era el mejor estado del arte sobre metacognici n, que no es otra cosa que la introspecci n, pero en versi n actualizada con criterios de las ciencias cognitivas Lo interesante es la recursividad Es pensamiento sobre el propio pensamiento Lo mejor es la fuerza epistemol gica de los experimentos que ya se hab an hecho por aquel entonces Pude hacer buena parte del marco te rico de mi tesis doctoral sobre esta idea de recursividad y sus l mites computacio A principios de los a os 2000 este libro era el mejor estado del arte sobre metacognici n, que no es otra cosa que la introspecci n, pero en versi n actualizada con criterios de las ciencias cognitivas Lo interesante es la recursividad Es pensamiento sobre el propio pensamiento Lo mejor es la fuerza epistemol gica de los experimentos que ya se hab an hecho por aquel entonces Pude hacer buena parte del marco te rico de mi tesis doctoral sobre esta idea de recursividad y sus l mites computacionales en el sesgo mental de ilusi n de verdad Es un libro l cido y bien escrito Todav a persigo preguntas que nacieron de esta lectura

  2. Max says:

    Read for an overview of what the psychological research on metacognition is up to, and noticed saddingly late that the book is almost as old as I am.I enjoyed getting a glimpse of the historical development of the research and a rough idea what people can and cannot reliably predict about their own performance When, for example, physics and music students in one study read about both concepts from music and physics, they could broadly predict that they will perform better in questions about con Read for an overview of what the psychological research on metacognition is up to, and noticed saddingly late that the book is almost as old as I am.I enjoyed getting a glimpse of the historical development of the research and a rough idea what people can and cannot reliably predict about their own performance When, for example, physics and music students in one study read about both concepts from music and physics, they could broadly predict that they will perform better in questions about concepts from their respective field, unsurprisingly But their predictive accuracy how well they would perform on individual questions was very low, to my surprise I would ve thought that you can at least predict a little bit how well you can apply recently aquired knowledge, but apparently this was not the case here 2 I liked the proposal that a major part of problem solving lies in useful problem representations One advantage is that good representations allow the problem solver to organize blocks of planned moves or strategies as a single chunk of memory In other words, good representations help reduce the memory demands found in many problems Second, good representations allow the problem solver to organize the conditions and rules of a problem and to determine whether certain steps are allowable and productive Finally, good representations allow the problem solver to keep track of where he or she is in terms of reaching a solution and to foresee potential obstacles to reaching the solution I would like to knowabout the state of the art of how one might go about modeling representation learning.Also, I think everyone today will note how early days the theory side of the research still was The most concrete models where abstract flowcharts with metacognition and object level cognition represented by black boxes I m looking forward to look at Dunlosky and Metcalfe s 2008 textbook on metacognition and see what happened in the 14 years of research The predictive accuracy here was measured with Goodman Kruskal s Gamma This measure has the downside of mixing together the ability to distinguish between correct and incorrect performance, and a bias towards over or underconfidence More on this in the excellent review, How to measure metacognition by Fleming and Lau 1 1 2